Manjinder Singh Kalsi Vs State of Punjab

Having heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and upon perusal of the record; this Court deems it appropriate to grant the application in hand and to recall the order dated 14.08.2026.

¶17

Accordingly, the application is allowed and order dated 14.08.2026 is recalled and the petition is ordered to be restored to its original number/status.

¶18

CRM-M-43823-2025

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action after arraying all concerned parties, in terms of the ratio decidendi of judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in ‘Rakesh Das Vs. State of Haryana and another’, Neutral

¶20

Citation: 2024:PHHC;147654-DB.

¶21

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.

¶22

CRM-37812-2026 in/and CRM-M-43823-2025

¶23

-2-

¶24

Ordered accordingly.

¶25

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

¶26

(SUMEET GOEL) September 11, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

¶27

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.

Manjinder Singh Kalsi v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjinder Singh Kalsi v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases