Disposed¶18

Ratun Duggal v. State of Punjab

Quashing petition – proclaimed person

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Apr 2026CRM-M/4278/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court; CRM-M-4278-2026 (O&M); Tarun Duggal v. State of Punjab; Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.; 01.04.2026; proclaimed person declaration order dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-4); quashing petition rendered infructuous on petitioner's arrest; disposed of; Section 528 BNSS preponement application CRM-13167-2026 allowed; hearing advanced from 08.09.2026; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; oral, unreasoned order; no citations.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner has been arrested, the petition seeking quashing of the order dated 12.06.2025 declaring him a proclaimed person has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. ¶18

Ratun Duggal Vs State of Punjab — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

147

¶3

CRM-M-4278-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-01.04.2026

TARUN DUGGAL

......PETITIONER

VS.

STATE OF PUNJAB

.....RESPONDENT

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

¶10

Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate with Ms. Monika Devi Koonj, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

¶12

¶13

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL )

¶14

CRM-13167-2026

¶15

This is an application filed under Section 528 of BNSS for preponing the date of hearing in the case i.e. fixed for 08.09.2026.

¶16

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the hearing of the main petition is advanced to today and the matter is taken up for hearing.

¶17

CRM-M-4278-2026

¶18

As the petitioner has been arrested, the present petition seeking quashing of the order dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.

¶19

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand

¶20

disposed of.

¶21

01.04.2 Kusum	026	(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
	*Whether speaking/reasoned*	*Yes/No*
	*Whether reportable*	*Yes/No*

¶22

Kusum

¶23

KUSUM 2026.04.01 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

Ratun Duggal v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratun Duggal v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Beant Kumar Punj Alias Beant Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Another

Manish @ Aman Pandit Vs State of Haryana

Jagdish Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ravinder Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harmeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rohit Khanna Vs State of Punjab and Others