Single judge allowed a second petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 BNSS 2023, observing that the matter had become infructuous as the petitioner stood arrested. No substantive hearing was conducted.
Petition declared infructuous and disposed of; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-41554-2026
1
101 (1st case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41554-2026
Ashutosh P a nwar alias Ashu State of Har y ana and another
versus
....Petitioner
....Respondents
Date of decision: September 11, 2026 Date of Uploading: September 11, 2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present : Mr. Pankaj Chug, Advocate, Ms. Aarzoo B. Garewal, Advoca t e for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Harya n a.
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
Present 2nd petition has been file d under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for gr a nt of anticipatory bail to the petiti o ner, in case bearing FIR No.265 dated 19.06.2025, registered under Sections 4 06, 420, 120-B of IPC, 1860, at Police Stati o n Chandimandir, District Panchkula.
(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE
September 11, 2026 mahavir Whether spe a king/reasoned: Yes/No Whether rep o rtable: Yes/No
MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.09.11 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second petition for anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS should be disposed of as it has become infructuous due to the arrest of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashutosh Panwar alias Ashu
State of Haryana and another
Sumeet Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
