This single-paragraph order references a detailed order of the same date in a connected petition involving the same parties, discharging substantive issues to that other judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
215-a
CRM-M-39765-2026 (O& M) Reserved on: 09.09.2026 Date of Pronouncement:11.09.2026 Date of Uploading : 12.09.2026
Pardeep Kumar
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
For detailed orders, see the orders of even date passed in connected petition bearing No.CRM-M-22323-2026 titled as ‘Rajat
Kumar versus State of Haryana’.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) September 11, 2026 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.12 11:00 I agree to specified portions of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukhpreet Kaur versus State of HaryanaReferred¶14
Sukhpreet Kaur versus State of Haryana
Pardeep Kumar
State of Haryana
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
