Allowed¶23

Yogesh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Apr 2026CRM-M/3949/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Criminal Misc. No. M-3949 of 2026, decided 23.04.2026, Surya Partap Singh, J. Yogesh v. State of Haryana. Anticipatory bail under S.482 BNSS 2023 in FIR No. 130 dated 09.10.2025, PS Jui Kalan, District Bhiwani (Ss.406, 420, 120-B IPC; S.22 Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019). Interim bail of 27.01.2026 made absolute; petition allowed; petitioner had joined investigation and custodial interrogation not required.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner; the interim anticipatory bail order dated 27.01.2026 made absolute. ¶23

Yogesh Vs State of Haryana — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

107

¶2

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶3

Criminal Misc. No. M-3949 of 2026

¶4

Date of Decision: 23.04.2026

Yogesh

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

¶11

Present: Mr. Harshit Jangra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶12

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

¶13

Surya Partap Singh, J.

¶14

This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 130 dated 09.10.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 406, 420 and 120-B of ‘the Indian Penal Code, 1860’ and Section 22 of ‘the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019’ Police Station Jui Kalan, District Bhiwani, Haryana.

¶15

Vide order dated 27.01.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

Criminal Misc. No. M-3949 of 2026

¶19

¶20

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 27.01.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 27.01.2026 be made absolute.

¶21

The learned State counsel, on instructions from ‘ASI Naresh Kumar’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

¶22

The record has been perused carefully.

¶23

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 27.01.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute.

¶24

(Surya Partap Singh) Judge

¶25

April 23, 2026 “DK”

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶27

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Yogesh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaljit Alias Gora Vs State of Punjab

Satnam Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jatinder Singh @ Kaku Vs State of Punjab

Harbhajan Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sandeep Bhatti Vs State of Punjab

Harpreet Singh @ Kaka Vs State of Punjab