Single judge application for regular bail under BNS. Court granted bail noting complete investigation, simple injuries, and absence of exceptional grounds to deprive liberty.
Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-36245 of 2026 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
222
CRM-M-36245 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:10.09.2026
Paras
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
| Sr. No. | Particular | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | The date when thejudgment is reserved | 09.09.2026 |
| 2. | The date when thejudgment ispronounced | 10.09.2026 |
| 3. | The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website |
10.09.2026 |
| 4. | Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or fulljudgment ispronounced |
Full |
| 5. | The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment and reasons thereof |
Not applicable. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Argued by: Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, DAG Haryana.
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J.
REEMA SAINIwhile two-three boys were outside, carrying a gandasi type weapon attached 2026.09.10 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
CRM-M-36245 of 2026 (O&M)
2
to the garari of the motorcycle and another youth was carrying a binda. They attacked the youths sitting in the tea shop, with intention to kill them and damaged the shop. Owner of mobile No. 8930572700 disclosed his name as Virender Kumar son of Mahender Singh and stated that the incident occurred on 19.05.2026 at about 04:25 PM at his tea shop, near Government School, village Prehladpur. In the incident some persons were injured and his shop was damaged. He later made the video viral apprehending danger to his life and property.
CRM-M-36245 of 2026 (O&M)
3
Investigation of the case is complete. Concededly, all injuries suffered by the injured are simple in nature. Trial is likely to take sometime to conclude. Petitioner cannot be deprived of his liberty as there are no exceptional grounds made out to refuse bail. There is no reason to suspect that petitioner would flee from process of law or tamper with evidence. In the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting on merits, petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
10.09.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
REEMA SAINI 2026.09.10 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail given the nature of the injuries and lack of exceptional grounds to refuse bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State of Haryana
Shalini Singh Nagpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
