Regular bail petition under Section 483 BNSS for FIR under Sections 103(1), 109, 118(1), 3(5) BNS was withdrawn by counsel before arguments concluded; court dismissed it as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
212-2
CRM-M-3316-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 20.05.2026
Manpreet Sing h @ Banga
...Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
...Respondent(s)
Present :- Mr . D.S. Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr . Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punja b .
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
Th e present first petition has been f iled under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 fo r grant of regular bail to the petitioner in c a se bearing FIR No.50 dated 1 5.03.2025 registered under Sections 109, 118(1), 3(5) [Section 103(1) add e d later on] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2 023 at Police Station Sadar, District Jalandhar. 2. After arguing the matter at so m e length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks with d rawal of the present petition at this stage.
20.05.2026 Sumit Gusain
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE
Whether s p eaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether re p ortable : Yes/No
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.21 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in FIR No.50 dated 15.03.2025.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manpreet Singh @ Banga
State of Punjab
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
