Disposed¶24

Dholu Ram v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Apr 2026CRM-M/3262/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM-M-3262-2026; Dholu Ram v. State of Haryana; High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; anticipatory bail; Section 482 of BNSS, 2023; Section 482(2) BNSS bail conditions; FIR No.06 dated 07.03.2025; Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau Gurugram (Haryana); Sections 120-B, 420 IPC; Section 13 Prevention of Corruption Act; interim order dated 19.02.2026 made absolute; petitioner joined investigation; not required for custodial interrogation; Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi; decision dated 22.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted - interim order dated 19.02.2026 made absolute, subject to the petitioner continuing to join the investigation as and when required and abiding by the conditions under Section 482(2) of BNSS. ¶24

Dholu Ram Vs State of Haryana — Corruption | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

204

¶3

CRM-M-3262-2026 Date of decision: 22.04.2026

¶4

DHOLU RAM

¶5

.... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

¶10

Present: Mr. R.S. Badhran, Advocate, Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocate, Ms. Alisha Badhran, Advocate and Mr. Deepal Tamang, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)

¶14

The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.06 dated 07.03.2025 under Sections 120-B, 420 IPC and Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau Gurugram (Haryana).

¶15

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 19.02.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶16

The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 19.02.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation.

¶17

In this view of the matter, interim order dated 19.02.2026 is

¶18

made absolute.

¶19

KUSUM 2026.04.23 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M-3262-2026

¶21

-2-

¶22

However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the