Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear when called twice, with liberty to seek revival if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
251
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-32205-2026 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026
SUNITA DEVI
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: None for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. .
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
for non-prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for revival thereof in case, any cause of action still subsists.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
July 02, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
KUSUM 2026.07.03 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sunita Devi
State of Haryana
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
