This single-paragraph order quashes an FIR and its consequential proceedings because the second respondent, appearing through an advocate, made a statement at the Bar indicating no objection to the quashing.
FIR and all its consequential proceedings qua the petitioners are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-32117-2026
-1-
275
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-32117-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Harsh Tanwar and others
….Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present: Mr. Pardeep Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate for respondent No.2.
RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral)
Sessions Judge, Ambala.
VISHNU 2026.09.10 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-32117-2026
-2-
well as the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 today in the Court, FIR Annexure P-1 and all its consequential proceedings qua the petitioners are quashed.
[ RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ] 10.09.2026 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
VISHNU 2026.09.10 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Harsh Tanwar and others
State of Haryana
Rajesh Nain
RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
