Allowed
Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/25977/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(211-2)
CRM-M-25977 of 2026 (O& M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
Amit Kumar
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vishal Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal and implead the complainant as party respondent in the array of the parties.
Ordered accordingly.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) September 11, 2026 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.11 17:05 I agree to specified portions of this document
Amit Kumar
State of Haryana
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court