Gursimran Singh Vs State of Haryana

T hrough the instant petition filed under Section 482 of th e Bharatiya Na g arik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (f o r short “BNSS”), the petitione r seeks anticip a tory bail in case FIR No.556 d ated 30.10.2025 under Section s 115, 118(1), 1 90, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) o f BNS 2023 (Section 117(2) o f BNS added la t er on) registered at Police Stati o n Civil Line, District Sirsa.

¶17

O n 10.02.2026, the following order was passed by the Co - ordinate Benc h of this Court: -

¶18

“The present petition has been filed under Section 482 o f B haratiya Nagrik Suraksha San h ita, 2023 seeking anticipator y bail for the petitioner in FIR N o.556 dated 30.10.2025 unde r S ections 115, 118(1), 190, 191 ( 2), 191(3) and 351(2) of BN S 2023 (Section 117(2) of BNS ad d ed later on) registered at Polic e S tation Civil Line, District Sirsa.

¶19

GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

¶20

CRM-M-2584-2026

¶21

2

¶22

Learned counsel for the p etitioner submits that the rol e attributed to the petitioner attra c ts only the provisions of Sectio n 117(2) of BNS, 2023 as the g r ievous injuries suffered by th e c o mplainant have been inflicte d by blunt weapon, whereas th e i n jury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature.

¶23

Learned State Counsel, o n the other hand, seeks som e m ore time to prepare and argue t he case.

¶24

On his request, adjourned t o 21.04.2026.

¶25

In the meantime, the p etitioner is directed to joi n i n vestigation as and when r equired by the Investigatin g A gency/Officer. In the even t of the petitioner joinin g i n vestigation, he shall be ad m itted to interim bail by th e arresting/investigating officer on his furnishing adequat e bail/surety bonds to the satisfact i on of the arresting/investigatin g o f ficer subject to the following conditions as envisaged unde r S ection 482(2) of the BNSS [erst w hile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.]:i) that the petitioner sh a ll make himself available fo r i n terrogation by a police officer a s and when required;

¶26

ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, mak e any inducement, threat or promi s e to any person acquainted wit h t h e facts of the case so as to d i ssuade him/her from disclosin g s u ch facts to the Court or to any p olice officer;

¶27

iii) that the petitioner sh a ll not leave India without th e prior permission of the Court;

¶28

iv) such other condition(s ) as may be imposed under sub - s e ction (3) of Section 480, as if t he bail were granted under tha t s e ction.”

¶29

L earned counsel for the petition e r submits that in compliance o f the order dat e d 10.02.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of Court, th e petitioner has j oined the investigation.

¶30

GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

¶31

CRM-M-2584-2026 3

¶32

L earned counsel for the State, on instructions of ASI Goku l Chand, has s u bmitted that the petitioner has j o ined the investigation and is n o longer required for further investigation.

¶33

I n view of the statement made by learned State counsel, th e interim order dated 10.02.2026 passed by t he Co-ordinate Bench of thi s Court, is mad e absolute. The petitioner shall c ontinue to join investigation, a s and when ca l led by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by th e conditions as p rovided under Section 482(2) o f the BNSS.

¶34

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 21.04.2026 JUDGE

¶35

Gurpreet

¶36

i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/ N o ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶37

GURPREET 2026.04.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Gursimran Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gursimran Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hawa Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ram Nath Vs State of Punjab and Others

Malkeet Singh @ Chitta Vs State of Punjab

Manjit Singh @ Bhola Vs State of Punjab

Manjit Kaur Vs Ranjit Kaur

Meet Kumar Alias Meet Vs State of Haryana and Another