After arguing at length, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition at this stage; the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without recording any finding on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
221
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-23167-2026 Date of Decision:26.05.2026
Jaspal @ Jaspal Ram …Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana …Respondent
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat
Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to
withdraw the present petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 26.05.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
HITESH 2026.05.26 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
Jaspal @ Jaspal Ram
State of Haryana
N.S. Shekhawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
