Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition at this stage. The court granted the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(209)
CRM-M-20125 of 2026 (O& M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
Ved Pal
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes
to withdraw this petition at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) September 11, 2026 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.11 17:05 I agree to specified portions of this document
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
