Petition rendered infructuous; counsel sought its disposal as such, and the court ordered accordingly without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
292 CRM-M-2012-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.03.2026
SUDHIR @ SUDHIR YADAV ... Petitioner
Versus
ROHTASH AND ANOTHER ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 11.03.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.03.11 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sudhir @ Sudhir Yadav
Rohtash
Another
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
