Disposed¶20

Sunny Bhatia v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC2 Apr 2026CRM-M/17608/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; CRM-M-17608-2026 (O&M); Sunny Bhatia v. State of Haryana & Ors.; decided 02.04.2026; judge Surya Partap Singh (oral); representation Annexure P-1 before respondent No.3; direction to decide representation by speaking order within 15 days; no finding on merits; independent assessment and independent decision; action sought against respondents No.5 to 8; notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3; service on State dispensed with; AAG Haryana Ramender Singh Chauhan; counsel Prabhat Sharma and Gopal Sharma for petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 directed to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-1) by passing a speaking order within 15 days from receipt of copy of the order, with no finding returned on merits and liberty for independent assessment and decision. ¶20

Sunny Bhatia Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

CRM-M-17608-2026 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

126 CRM-M-17608-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 02.04.2026

¶5

SUNNY BHATIA

¶6

.....PETITIONER VERSUS

¶7

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

¶8

.....RESPONDENTS

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

¶10

Present: Mr. Prabhat Sharma and Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauh a n, AAG Haryana.

¶12

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)

¶13

The instant petition has b een filed by the petitioner for direction s to the respondents No.1 to 3 t o take appropriate action against the responde n ts No.5 to 8.

¶14

The learned counsel represe n ting the petitioner submits that the petitione r has filed the representation (A n nexure P-1) before the respon d ent No.3. Th e learned counsel prays for di r ections to the respondent No. 3 to decide th e abovementioned representatio n within the stipulated time.

¶15

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 .

¶16

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauh a n, AAG Haryana

¶17

Hence service of notice upon the State is h e reby dispensed with.

¶18

GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.03 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-17608-2026 (O&M) 8587 2

¶20

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petitio n is hereby d i sposed of with a direction to t he respondent No.3 to decide the represent a tion of the petitioner (Annexu r e P-1) by passing a speaking o r der within a p eriod of 15 days from the date o f receipt of copy of instant ord e r It is howev e r clarified that no finding is b eing returned, by this Court, w ith regard to merits of the contents of repres e ntation. The respondent No.3 s h all be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to content s of represent a tion of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his o wn level.

¶21

Gaurav Thakur W hether speaking/reasoned : Ye s/No W hether reportable : Y es/No

¶22

GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.03 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sunny Bhatia v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny Bhatia v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Alias Sudama Vs State of Punjab

Rajesh Vs Poonam

Madan Singh Vs State of Haryana

Dheeraj Vs State of Punjab

Deepak Raj Vs State of Punjab

Dashav Dhir @ Dashav @ Dhashav Vs Sunil Kumar