Petitioner invoked Section 528 BNSS seeking directions against multiple POCSO inquiries and requesting a final report. Court relied on police status report deeming petitioner innocent.
Court found no directions required as police had already found petitioner innocent; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-17563-2026 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
224
CRM-M-17563-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.09.2026
AXXX
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing).
Mr. Kshitij Bharati, AAG Haryana.
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)
Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 seeks following reliefs:
involved in the crime and was found innocent.
HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 18:56 I agree to specified portions of this document
2
CRM-M-17563-2026 (O&M)
required to be issued in the petition.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
11.09.2026
HS.CHAUHAN
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :
Yes/No Yes/No
HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 18:56 I agree to specified portions of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions are required to be issued regarding multiple inquiries in FIR No.411 given the police status report.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
AXXX
State of Haryana
Shalini Singh Nagpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
