Raj Sharma Alias Nuryo v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
CRM-M-15193-2026 (O&M), Punjab & Haryana High Court, decided 02.07.2026, Manisha Batra, J.: regular bail under S.483 BNSS allowed to Raj Sharma alias Nuryo in NDPS case (FIR No.403 dt.16.06.2025, PS Sadar Gurgaon; Ss.21(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) NDPS Act; S.29 NDPS Act and S.14 Foreigner Act, 1946 added later); implication based on co-accused Bimal Pahadi's disclosure statement; no recovery from petitioner; Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) 4 SCC 1 relied on re inadmissibility of S.67 NDPS disclosure statements without independent corroboration; bail subject to bonds and conditions including SHO reporting on first Monday monthly; earlier rejection by ASJ Gurugram dt.10.02.2026.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing personal bond and 02 surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, and subject to conditions: (i) not to leave the country without permission of the learned trial Court; (ii) to appear on each and every date of hearing; (iii) to provide permanent and present address before the trial Court at the time of furnishing bonds and not change the same without informing the trial Court; (iv) to deposit passport, if any, with the trial Court; (v) to appear before the concerned SHO on the first Monday of every month during the pendency of the trial. In case of breach of any condition, the respondent-State is at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail. Pending application(s), if any, rendered infructuous.