The petitioner, Samim, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition (CRM-M-14814-2026). The learned Justice permitted the withdrawal, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14814-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
SAMIM
…Petitioner
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kshitij Bharati, AAG, Haryana.
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral)
Reply by way of affidavit of Ramesh Kumar, HPS, DSP, Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar has been filed by State of Haryana, which is taken on record.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Permitted.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 10.09.2026 JUDGE Sumit Singla
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUMIT SINGLA 2026.09.10 19:08 I agree to specified portions of this document
Samim
State of Haryana
Shalini Singh Nagpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
