Regular bail petition in a murder case; counsel sought withdrawal and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14637-2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026
Hardeep Singh @ Ghuggu
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab ..... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present :- Ms. Poonam Singh Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab.
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
the petitioner in case FIR No.12 dated 27.02.2024, under Sections 302, 307, 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, (Police challan under Sections 302, 307, 34, 120-B of IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act) registered at Police Station Punjab Agriculture University (PAU), District Ludhiana, Punjab.
26.05.2026 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) m. sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
MAMTA 2026.05.27 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Hardeep Singh @ Ghuggu
State of Punjab
Rajesh Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
