Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition, which was then dismissed. All pending complaints, if any, were also disposed of.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending complaints disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
251
CRM-M-14329-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026
SANTOKH SINGH AND ANOTHER ….Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:- Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.8.
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be
permitted to withdraw the petition.
Permitted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending CRM(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
10.09.2026
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
Jyoti-V
JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
SANTOKH SINGH AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
