Petition by Baldev Kaur against the State of Haryana was disposed of by referring to an order of even date in a connected matter (CRM-M-10902-2026, Joginder Sharma v. State of Haryana); no independent reasoning is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-13239-2026 Date of decision :26.05.2026 Uploaded on: 26.05.2026.
BALDEV KAUR
. .. Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Keerat Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana assisted by Mr. Manjeet Singh, Dy. Director Prosecution and Mr. Vijay Kumar Nehra, DSP, SV/ACB, Panchkula.
Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate for aggrieved investors.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
For order see, vide an order of even date passed in CRM-
M-10902-2026 titled as Joginder Sharma Versus State of Haryana .
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
26.05.2026
JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
JITESH LAL 2026.05.26 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Baldev Kaur
State of Haryana
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
