Manjeet Singh v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Text is largely corrupted by OCR encoding loss. Surviving passages indicate this was a regular bail matter (CRM-M) in which the court considered that prolonged, indefinite detention of the accused justified consideration of a fresh bail application on its own merits notwithstanding repeated earlier filings, citing Apex Court observations that each day in custody can furnish a new cause of action for bail.
What the court decided
CRM-M-12881-2026 -1-
������������������������������������� ��������������
����������������
�������������
��������������
�������
�����������������
��������������
| Sr. No. | Particulars | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The date when the judgment is reserved | 15.05.2026 |
| 2 | The date when the judgment is pronounced | 20.05.2026 |
| 3 | The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website | 20.05.2026 |
| 4 | Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full judgment is pronounced |
Full |
| 5 | The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and reasons thereof |
Not applicable |
�������������������������������������������
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a fresh bail application could be entertained where the accused has remained in custody for an indefinite period despite earlier applications.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/12881/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court