Petitioner prayed for withdrawal of writ petition. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition if trial lacks progress. Writ dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
214
CRM-M-12223-2026 Date of decision : 07.07.2026
IKPREET SINGH ALIAS EKPREET SINGH
... PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
.. RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.
H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral)
(H.S.GREWAL) 07.07.2026 JUDGE Sonia
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SONIA GUGNANI 2026.07.07 17.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IKPREET SINGH ALIAS EKPREET SINGH
STATE OF HARYANA
H.S.GREWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
