Rajender v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail; Punjab & Haryana High Court; CRM-M-11949-2026; Justice Subhas Mehla; FIR; petitioner specifically named; failure to join investigation; Village Kuleri Sarpanch certificate; Deepak son of Inder Singh; serious allegations; custodial interrogation; false surety; fraud with Court. Court's ruling text unreadable in source.
What the court decided
���������������������������-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
����
CRM-M-11949-2026 Decided on: 24.03.2026
���������
…...Petitioner Versus
����������������
…...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Mohan Singla, Advocate
���������������������
������������������������������������������
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves the concession of anticipatory bail.medium confidence¶25
Procedural history
How this case reached the court
- Prior proceeding
Criminal case arising out of an FIR in which the petitioner is specifically named; the petitioner allegedly did not join the investigation despite repeated attempts.¶22
- Prior proceeding
On further inquiry, the Sarpanch of Village Kuleri gave in writing that there is no person named Deepak son of Inder Singh in that village.¶22
Coram
Subhas Mehlaauthor¶9
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/11949/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court