Petition for anticipatory relief; State reported the petitioner had joined investigation and been declared innocent, so counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203
CRM-M-11877-2026 Date of decision: 15.05.2026
AMRITPAL SINGH
….Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: M s. Sagarika, Advocate for M r. Himmat Singh Deol, Advoc a te f o r the petitioner.
M r. Amrit Pal Singh Gill, DAG, P unjab.
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL)
15.05.2026 JUDGE
Gurpreet
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/ N o ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
GURPREET 2026.05.18 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Amritpal Singh
State of Punjab
Rupinderjit Chahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
