Allowed¶22

Wasim v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Apr 2026CRM-M/11325/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wasim v. State of Haryana; Criminal Misc. No. M-11325 of 2026; High Court of Punjab and Haryana (Chandigarh); anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; Sections 5 and 13(2) Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act 2015; Section 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960; FIR No.147 dated 27.06.2025 PS Pinangwan District Nuh; interim anticipatory bail made absolute; petitioner joined investigation; custodial interrogation not required; Munfaid Khan for petitioner; Ramender Singh Chauhan AAG for State; decided 08.04.2026 by Surya Partap Singh, J.; petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail order dated 18.03.2026 made absolute; petitioner admitted to anticipatory bail (bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer, having joined the investigation). ¶22

Wasim Vs State of Haryana — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

102

¶2

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶3

Criminal Misc. No. M-11325 of 2026

¶4

Date of Decision: 08.04.2026

Wasim

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

¶11

Present: Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶12

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

¶13

Surya Partap Singh, J.

¶14

This petition for anticipatory bail, is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.147 dated 27.06.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 5 and 13(2) of ‘the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015’ and Section(s) 11 of ‘the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960’ Police Station Pinangwan, District Nuh, Haryana.

¶15

Vide order dated 18.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.08 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

Criminal Misc. No. M-11325 of 2026 2

¶19

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 18.03.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 18.03.2026 be made absolute.

¶20

The learned State Counsel has filed status report. The same be taken on record. The learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

¶21

The record has been perused carefully.

¶22

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already join the investigation, the order dated 18.03.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. The present petition stands allowed , accordingly.

¶23

(Surya Partap Singh) Judge

¶24

April 08, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.08 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Wasim v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wasim v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurtej Singh Alias Lalli Vs State of Punjab

Bhupinder Singh Alias Bhinda Vs State of Punjab

Mohammad Wasim Akram Vs State of Punjab

Shiv Kumar Vs Rampal Singla

Paramjit Singh Alias Galla Vs State of Punjab

Ram Chander @ Ramu Vs State of Punjab