Petition disposed of by reference to the court's detailed order of the same date in a connected matter, without independent discussion of facts or grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202
CRM-M-10769-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 19.03.2026
Rajwant Kaur @ Raji
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms . Rishma Verma, Advocate for t h e petitioner.
Mr . Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punja b .
Mr . Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate for the complainant.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
Fo r detailed order, see order of e v en date passed in CRM-M-
66756-2025 titl e d as " Sahil Vs. State of Punjab. ".
19.03.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether spe a king/reasoned : Yes/No Whether rep o rtable : Yes/No
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.19 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sahil Vs. State of PunjabReferred
CRM-M-66756-2025 titled as "Sahil Vs. State of Punjab"
Rajwant Kaur @ Raji
State of Punjab
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
