Appeal disposed of by reference to a connected appeal of the same date; this order itself decides nothing substantive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRA-D-80-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026
NISHAN SINGH
...Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Ms. Medha Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
For order see connected appeal bearing No. CRA-D-564-2024
titled as Gurpinder Singh @ Pindu Vs. State of Punjab , of even date.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) 14.07.2026 JUDGE jyoti3
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
JYOTI 2026.07.16 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nishan Singh
State of Punjab
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
Sukhvinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
