Appeal against dismissal of regular bail under Section 439 CrPC in an Arms Act and UAPA case was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
103-1 CRA-D-259-2024 Date of Decision: 04.02.2026 BALJIT SINGH ......... Pe��oner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB ......... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present:Mr. Harmanpreet S. Mander, Advocate for Mr. Harpreet Singh Multani, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta3on | Sec3ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 22.09.2022 | SSOC, Amritsar | 25/54/59 of Arms Act and 10, |
| 13,18,20 UAP Act |
23.01.2024 passed by learned Addi�onal Sessions Judge, Jalandhar vide which the bail filed
under Sec�on 439 CrPC of the appellant has been dismissed in the above cap�oned FIR.
appeal.
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 04.02.2026 Jyo�-II Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: No.
JYOTI 2026.02.05 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Baljit Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
Sukhvinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
