Disposed¶29

Satpal Dhiman v. Deepak Jain

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Feb 2026CR/5648/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satpal Dhiman v. Deepak Jain; Civil Revision No.5648 of 2025; High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh; decided 06.02.2026 by Justice Vikas Bahl (oral judgment). Key terms: Article 227 Constitution of India; revision petition; impugned order dated 28.07.2025; Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Jagadhari; Execution No.36 of 2025; auction of jointly owned property; stay of execution dated 22.08.2025; National Lok Adalat; Daily Lok Adalat; compromise; adjournment slip; liberty to revive; petition disposed. Reportable: No.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition after complying with the order dated 22.08.2025 ¶29

Satpal Dhiman Vs Deepak Jain — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

CR No.5648 of 2025

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

209

¶5

Civil Revision No.5648 of 2025 Date of decision: February 6^th , 2026

Satpal Dhiman

.....Petitioner

Versus

Deepak Jain

.....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

¶12

Present: Mr. Hans Raj Verma, Advocate for Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Ms. Rajni Bala Rohilla, Advocate for Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

¶14

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

On 22.08.2025, a coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to

¶16

pass the following order:

¶17

“Present: Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶18

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the impugned order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P- 1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Jagadhari, in Execution No.36 of 2025 vide which the property jointly owned by the petitioner has been put to auction for 01.09.2025.

¶19

Today, counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was in jail but now he was released on bail and he wants to compromise with the decree holder, therefore, execution of the impugned order dated 28.07.2025 may kindly be stayed.

¶20

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.02.06 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶21

-2-

¶22

CR No.5648 of 2025

¶23

Notice of motion for 13.09.2025 for the purpose of compromise only. Case to be put up in National Lok Adalat.

¶24

In the meanwhile, execution of the impugned order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) shall remain stayed.

¶25

AUGUST 22, 2025 ”

¶26

A perusal of the above would show that execution of the impugned order was stayed only on the ground that the petitioner wanted to compromise the matter. The subsequent orders passed before the Daily Lok Adalat would show that none had appeared on 12.11.2025 and also on 02.12.2025 and on 20.01.2026, the counsel for the petitioner had stated that he has instructions not to settle the matter.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for an adjournment without filing an adjournment slip.

¶28

Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the said prayer. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the present petition be disposed of but liberty granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the order dated 22.08.2025.

¶29

Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the order dated 22.08.2025.

¶30

February 6^th, 2026 Puneet		(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	:	Yes
Whether reportable	:	No

¶31

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.02.06 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Satpal Dhiman v. Deepak Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satpal Dhiman v. Deepak Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu @ Sukhdev Vs Sunil and Others

Ambu Vs Surjit Singh

Ghanshyam Dass and Others Vs Nanu Mal and Others

Sarabjit Singh (Since Deceased) through Lr Vs Harmit Kaur and Others

Ranjit Singh and Another Vs M/S Ardee Business Centre Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Sumitra & Ors. Vs Ram Narain & Ors.