Petitioners challenged the order but conceded the facts and withdrew the civil revision. The High Court dismissed the revision as withdrawn and dismissed pending miscellaneous applications accordingly.
The civil revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5077-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026
Tayyub Hussain and another
....Petitioners
Vs.
Tejpal and others ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:Mr. Yash Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral)
withdrawn.
disposed of accordingly.
(AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE
10.09.2026 lalit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tayyub Hussain
Tayyub Hussain and another
Tejpal
Amarjot Bhatti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
