The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioner stated that the main suit giving rise to the revision had already been decided.
The revision petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
264
CR-4879-2019 Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Narinder Singh . . . . Petitioner Vs. Shri Darbar Sahib and others . . . . Respondents ** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA** **** Present: - Mr.Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, for Mr.Satinder Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Mr.Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, appearing for Mr.Satinder Khanna,
Advocate, counsel for the petitioner, has made a statement that main suit, out of which the present revision petition has arisen, has since been decided and therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
the petitioner, present petition is hereby disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) 10.09.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
VIVEK PAHWA 2026.09.10 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Narinder Singh
Shri Darbar Sahib
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
