Ghan Shyam (Deceased) through Lr Hari Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 May 2026CR/3592/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Time-bound disposal of execution proceedings against State of Haryana/HSVP; Article 227 Civil Revision; Execution No. 2564 of 2021 (Ghan Shyam v. State of Haryana) before Gurugram Executing Court; calculation dispute referred to Executing Court on Form-'D'; Rs. 15 lakhs stated paid; six-month timeline; landowner compensation prejudice; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a request/direction to the learned Executing Court (Additional District Judge, Gurugram-cum-Executing Court) to decide Execution No. 2564 of 2021 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months, adjudicating the calculation dispute from the records including Form-'D'; pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. ¶¶23

Ghan Shyam (Deceased) through Lr Hari… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether this Court should direct time-bound disposal of Execution No. 2564 of 2021 pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram-cum-Executing Court. +1 more

¶¶15

Court's answer

The learned Executing Court is requested to decide/dispose of the Execution Petition as expeditiously as possible, as per law, preferably within a period of six months, since further delay would seriously prejudice the rights of the petitioner/landowner.

¶¶22

Ratio / Principle

Once the execution is pending, the dispute qua calculation shall be adjudicated upon by the learned Executing Court by looking into the relevant records, especially Form-'D'.

¶¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Punjab & Haryana (Harkesh Manuja, J.) — Civil Revision No. 3592 of 2026 (O&M) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, decided 22.05.2026. Petitioner (Ghan Shyam through LR Hari Singh) sought directions to the Additional District Judge, Gurugram-cum-Executing Court to decide Execution No. 2564 of 2021 (“Ghan Shyam versus State of Haryana”) within a time-bound period. Respondent's Director (Town & Country Planning) stated Rs. 15 lakhs had been paid; petitioner disputed the calculation. Held: while execution is pending, the dispute qua calculation falls to be adjudicated by the Executing Court on the relevant records, especially Form-'D'; Executing Court requested to dispose of the execution petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months, further delay seriously prejudicing the petitioner/landowner. Petition disposed of accordingly.

¶1

163

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

Civil Revision No. 3592 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026

¶4

Ghan Shyam (deceased) through LR Hari Singh

¶5

.......... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Haryana and others

¶8

.......... Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶10

Present: Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Komal Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Hayana for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

¶12

Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent No. 3-HSVP.

¶13

¶14

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

¶15

The petitioner, by way of present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeks issuance of directions to the learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram-cum-Executing Court to decide the execution proceedings in Execution No. 2564 of 2021 , titled “Ghan Shyam Versus State of Haryana.” within a time bound period .

¶16

[2] Notice in the present case was issued on 30.04.2026.

¶17

[3] At the time of hearing, Mr. Amit Khatri, Director, Department of Town & Country Planning, Haryana, who joins the proceedings through video-conferencing, submits that a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs has been paid to the petitioner.

¶18

[4] On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the calculation made by the respondent(s).

¶19

DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.25 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CR No. 3592 of 2026 (O&M) [2]

¶21

[5] Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the humble opinion of this Court, once the execution is pending; the dispute qua calculation shall be adjudicated upon by the learned Executing Court by looking into the relevant records, especially Form-‘D’.

¶22

[6] In view of above, the learned Executing Court is requested to decide / dispose of the aforesaid Execution Petition as expeditiously as possible, as per law, preferably within a period of six months from today, as any further delay is going to cause serious prejudice to the rights of petitioner / landowner.

¶23

[7] Petition stands disposed off accordingly.

¶24

[8] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand

¶25

disposed off.

¶26

May 22, 2026	( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'	JUDGE
Whether Speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶27

DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.25 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ghan Shyam (Deceased) through Lr Hari Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghan Shyam (Deceased) through Lr Hari Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Endee Woollen and Skills Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Another

Indro and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Another

Ghan Shyam (Deceased) Thr Lr Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Tanjit Kaur Vs Manjit Kaur

Bimla and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others