Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and Ors. v. Sushil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed two revision petitions as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh ejectment petition against the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Revision petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh ejectment petitions.
What the court decided
206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: September 11, 2026
(i) CR-3363-2009
Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others …Pe��oners
Versus
Gulshan Kumar Jindal …Respondent
*** * * * (ii) CR-3364-2009 Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others …Pe��oners Versus Sh. Sushil Kumar …Respondent**
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Deepak Sabherwal and Ms. Hi�ka Sabherwal, Advocates for the respondent.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
At the outset, statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oner that he may be permi�ed to withdraw the aforesaid revision pe��ons with liberty to ins�tute fresh ejectment pe��on against the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others
- respondent
Gulshan Kumar Jindal
- respondent
Sh. Sushil Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/3364/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court