Revised petitions concerning ejectment were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court granted liberty to file fresh ejectment petitions in accordance with law. No substantive legal propositions were laid down in this order.
The revision petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh ejectment petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: September 11, 2026
(i) CR-3363-2009
Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others …Pe��oners
Versus
Gulshan Kumar Jindal …Respondent
*** * * * (ii) CR-3364-2009 Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others …Pe��oners Versus Sh. Sushil Kumar …Respondent**
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Deepak Sabherwal and Ms. Hi�ka Sabherwal, Advocates for the respondent.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
At the outset, statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oner that he may be permi�ed to withdraw the aforesaid revision pe��ons with liberty to ins�tute fresh ejectment pe��on against the respondent.
Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.
September 11, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2026.09.11 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sarabjot Kaur Dhillon and others
Gulshan Kumar Jindal
Sh. Sushil Kumar
DeePak guPta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
