In the absence of the petitioner, the High Court dismissed two revision petitions filed by a decree holder against an executing court order dismissing a fresh execution petition, granting liberty to revive the matter if any cause of action survives.
Both revision petitions dismissed in default with liberty to revive the matter if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
312 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: September 10, 2026
(i)
CR-2598-2006
Sohan Lal …Pe��oner
Versus
**State of Haryana …Respondent * * * ***
(ii) CR-2599-2006 Sohan Lal …Pe��oner
Versus
State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None for the pe��oner.
Mr. Harshit Singh, AAG, Haryana.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the pe��oner. The ma�er was admi�ed way back on 20.08.2007 and has been listed today a�er a long interregnum.
any cause of ac�on s�ll survives.
SARITA RANI 2026.09.10 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-2598 and CR-2598 of 2006
- 2 -
2026:PHHC:128251
address.
Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.
September 10, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2026.09.10 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sohan Lal
State of Haryana
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
