Revision petition challenged dismissal of an application under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC seeking stay of execution of a judgment and decree. Counsel sought withdrawal after arguing for some time; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
Civil Revision No.2098 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.03.2026
Gaje Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
Ram Bilas
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present revisio n petition is for setting aside the impu g ned order dated 21.1.2026 ( A nnexure P-3) passed by the learned A dditional District Judge, His a r whereby application filed under Or d er 41 Rule 5 CPC (Annexure P -2) to stay the execution of judgment and decree dated 04.7.2025 ( Annexure P-1) filed by the petitione r has been dismissed.
After arguing for some ti m e, learned counsel for the petitione r prays for withdrawal of the pre s ent revision petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stand(s) disposed of.
March 0 6 , 2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gaje Singh
Ram Bilas
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
