Dismissed¶18

Sushil Kumar v. Ashok Kumar

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Feb 2026CR/1982/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; CR-1982-2025 (O&M); Sushil Kumar vs Ashok Kumar; Alka Sarin, J. (Oral); Article 227 of the Constitution of India; civil revision petition; mesne profits Rs. 6,000/- per month; Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur; eviction order dated 25.07.2024; impugned order dated 07.11.2024; no ground to entertain revision; revision petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Since no argument was raised except that the amount of mesne profits be reduced, no ground is made out to entertain the present revision petition; the revision petition is dismissed and pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶18

Sushil Kumar Vs Ashok Kumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

142

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CR-1982-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.02.2026

¶4

Sushil Kumar ... Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Ashok Kumar ... Respondent(s)

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

¶8

Present : Mr. Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

¶10

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur whereby the mesne profits have been assessed as ₹6,000/- per month.

¶11

The impugned order was passed on 07.11.2024 and the present revision petition was preferred on 07.03.2025 and since then the same has been pending before this Court. Repeatedly adjournments are being sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Today also the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no lease deed to show the current market rate.

¶12

No other arguments have been addressed.

¶13

In the present case the eviction of the petitioner was directed vide

¶14

order dated 25.07.2024 (Annexure P-1). Today the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to apprise this Court as to whether any amount at all has been deposited towards mesne profits as directed vide order dated 07.11.2024.

¶15

YOGESH SHARMA 2026.02.28 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh

¶16

CR-1982-2025 (O&M)

¶17

¶18

Since no other argument has been raised except stating that the amount of mesne profits be reduced, no ground is made out to entertain the present revision petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

¶19

25.02.2026

¶20

( ALKA SARIN )

¶21

Yogesh Sharma JUDGE

¶22

NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO

¶23

YOGESH SHARMA 2026.02.28 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh

Sushil Kumar v. Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar v. Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Vs Kalawati and Another

Jinnt and Others Vs Kapoor Alam Khan and Others

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Parkash Chand and Others

Sushila and Ors. Vs Balbir etc.

Improvement Trust Rupnagar Vs Gurdial Kaur (Since Deceased) Represented by Her Lrs. Daljit Singh and Ors.

Manjit Kaur and Anr. Vs Gurvinder Singh Alias Bindi and Ors.