Civil revision under Article 227 challenging dismissal of an application for valuation of a building. Counsel sought withdrawal; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
326
Civil Revision No.1376 of 2025 Date of decision: May 19th , 2026
Kanya Shikshan Maha Vidayalya Parbandh Samiti
.....Petitioner
Versus
Dera Baba Guru Brahma Nand Ji Bani Pundri and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate for the respondents.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
May 19th , 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.19 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanya Shikshan Maha Vidayalya Parbandh Samiti
Dera Baba Guru Brahma Nand Ji Bani Pundri
Others
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
