Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ court order directing decision of a legal notice regarding transport authorities. Respondent produced compliance showing the notice was decided by speaking order dated 16.03.2026; petition disposed of with liberty to challenge that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP-989-2026(O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
232
COCP-989-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2026
Pritpal Kaur & ors.
.… Pe00oners
Versus
Shri Baljinder Singh Dhillon
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the pe00oners.
Mr. Am0az Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
MONIKA VERMA 2026.03.25 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh
COCP-989-2026(O&M)
-2-
respondent vide Speaking Order dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure R-1/1). As such, nothing survives in the present pe00on.
aforesaid Speaking Order, in accordance with law, if so advised or any cause of ac0on s0ll survives.
24.03.2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
MONIKA VERMA 2026.03.25 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh
Pritpal Kaur & ors.
Shri Baljinder Singh Dhillon
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
