Petitioners sought contempt proceedings for non-compliance with a Writ Court order. State counsel submitted the order was complied with and the report available. The court found nothing to adjudicate.
The contempt petition was dismissed as there was nothing remaining to be adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4403-2026 Date of decision : 11.09.2026
Naveen Kumar and another ...Petitioners Vs. Neha Singh and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Present: Ms. Neha, Advocate for Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G.Haryana. *******
DEEPAK MANCHANDA, J.(Oral)
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 11.09.2026 vanita Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No
VANITA 2026.09.11 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and judgment
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' petition for initiating contempt proceedings warrants admission given alleged compliance.
Whether any substantive issue remains for adjudication in the contempt petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naveen Kumar
another
Neha Singh
another
DEEPAK MANCHANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
