Disposed¶27

Jayant Contractor v. Mohd. Shayin and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Mar 2026COCP/392/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

COCP-392-2026 (O&M); Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; Justice Sudeepti Sharma; contempt petition; disobedience of order dated 14.10.2024 in CWP-26292-2024; Jayant Contractor vs Mohd. Shayin and others; Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division No.1, Kaimri Road, Hisar; representation dated 13.08.2024; compliance reported; amount disbursed; Rs.50,000/- costs deposited with Poor Patient Welfare Fund (PPWF), PGIMER Chandigarh; contempt purged; rule discharged; pending applications disposed of; decision dated 18.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Contempt purged and rule stands discharged upon finding of compliance with order dated 14.10.2024 in CWP-26292-2024; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶27

Jayant Contractor Vs Mohd. Shayin and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

-1-

¶2

COCP-392-2026 (O&M)

¶3

111

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

COCP-392-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026

Jayant Contractor

......Petitioner

Vs.

Mohd. Shayin and others

¶10

......Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

¶12

Present : Mr. Sachin Mankash, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents.

¶14

¶15

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)

¶16

The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and

¶17

intentional disobedience of order dated 14.10.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-26292-2024, whereby the following order was passed:-

¶18

“XXX XXX XXX XXX

¶19

Accordingly, in view of the above; with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of while directing respondent No.4- Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Division No.1, Kaimri Road, Hisar, to consider and decide the representation dated 13.08.2024 (Annexure P-4) by passing a reasoned and speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties within a period of three months of the receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶20

Needless to mention that upon considering the said legal notice, if any amount is found due and payable to the petitioner, the same shall be disbursed in favour of the petitioner within a further period of three months.

¶21

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.20 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶22

COCP-392-2026 (O&M)

¶23

-2-

¶24

In the event of non-payment of dues within the abovesaid period, the same shall be released along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of present petition to be paid to the petitioner and further subject to additional payment of costs of Rs.50,000/- to be deposited with the Poor Patient Welfare Fund (PPWF) of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh. The said additional financial liability of accrued interest and costs shall be recovered from the erring official.”

¶25

In compliance of order dated 14.10.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-26292-2024, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the amount has already been disbursed in favour of the petitioner and the costs of Rs.50,000/- has been deposited with the Poor Patient Welfare Fund of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.

¶27

In view of the above, since order dated 14.10.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-26292-2024, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged.

¶28

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶29

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE

¶30

18.03.2026 Virender

¶31

Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶32

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.20 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jayant Contractor v. Mohd. Shayin and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayant Contractor v. Mohd. Shayin and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Gopal Cashier (Retd.) Vs Pseb and Others

B.R. Verma Vs Dakshin Hary.. Board Prasaran Nigam Ltd.

(O&M)Vijay Vs United India Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Vikas Kumar Vs Dr. Sumita Mishra, IAS and Others

Aslam Khan Vs Anshu Singla IPS

State of Haryana etc. Vs Parkash Chand