The High Court disposed of a contempt petition by the petitioner as not pressed since the respondent filed a compliance affidavit and paid the awarded financial benefits, constituting substantial compliance with the earlier Writ Court order.
Contempt petition disposed of as not pressed; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
103
COCP-3842-2026
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
Ram Niwas
...Petitioner
Versus
Vikram
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present:Mr. Amarjit Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advocate for Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent.
VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
(2)
COCP-3842-2026
P-1). The same is taken on record. A copy thereof stands furnished to learned counsel opposite.
( VIKAS SURI ) September 11, 2026 JUDGE
harish
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Ram Niwas
Vikram
VIKAS SURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
