Single-paragraph single-justice order dismissing a contempt petition due to compliance of a previous court order.
Contempt petition is disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3715-2026 Date of Decision:- 11.09.2026
BIMLA MALIK
....Petitioner
Vs.
NARAYANAN AND ANR. ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:Mr. Aamol Singh, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana.
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
Written response along with reply to the legal notice dated 08.04.2026 has been filed. Copy already furnished to the petitioner.
In light of this, there is due compliance of general directions contained in the order dated 01.03.2004 passed in CWP-526-2004 (Annexure P-6).
Since no further action is required in the present contempt petition, therefore, present contempt petition stands disposed off.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well.
(AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE
11.09.2026
snd Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No
SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.09.11 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
BIMLA MALIK
NARAYANAN AND ANR.
Amarjot Bhatti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
