Disposed
Rishpal Saini v. Daljinder Singh Dhillon Pps
Punjab & Haryana HCCOCP/3048/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3048-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 10.09.2026
RISHUPAL SAINI
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
DALJINDER SINGH DHILLON PPS
.....RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Geeteshwar Saini, Advocate an d Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate for th e petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Pu nj ab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J (ORAL)
1 . By w ay of the present petition the f o llowing prayer has been made:“ Contempt petition under S ection 12 of the Contempt o f Courts Act, 1971 for initiatin g appropriate proceedings unde r the Contempt of Court Act a g ainst the respondent and punis h him for willfully and deliber a tely disobeying the order date d 30.07.2024 passed by the D ivision Bench of this Hon’bl e Court in CWP No.2066/2018; National Anti Crime an d Human Rights Protection of I ndia Vs. State of Punjab & Ors . (Annexure P-1) vide which t h e State of Punjab was directe d to ensure that whenever a c o mplaint is made which reflect s commission of cognizable offence, an FIR ought to b e registered;
AND/OR
HIMANSHU 2026.09.11 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-3048-2026 (O&M)
-2-
Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may kindly be passed.”
2. Notice of motion.
3. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.
4. Learned State counsel, on telephonic instructions from Mr. Manpreet Singh, SSP, Pathankot and ASI Narinder Singh who is present in Court, submits that, considering the nature and impact of the injuries sustained by the petitioner, the matter needs to be re-examined and the needful shall be done within one week from today.
5. In view of the aforesaid stand of respondent the present petition is
disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of as well.
10.09.2026
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE
himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
HIMANSHU 2026.09.11 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
RISHUPAL SAINI
DALJINDER SINGH DHILLON
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court