The Court held that the respondent had passed a speaking order dated 20.05.2026 as directed in the previous order dated 02.09.2025. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed as purged, and the rule was discharged. The petitioner was left free to challenge the speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP-1867-2026 (O&M) -1-
221
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1867-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026
Holy Angel School
......Petitioner
Vs.
Jatinder Kumar ......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present : Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, and Ms. Anita Kumari, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)
is taken on record. A copy thereof has been given to the learned counsel for
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.29 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-1867-2026 (O&M)
-2-
the petitioner.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
26.05.2026 Virender
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.29 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 02.09.2025 was complied with to purge the contempt?
Holy Angel School
Jatinder Kumar
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
