The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn based on a statement by the petitioner and reliance on a prior order in LPA-1810-2025 which mandated a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
106
COCP-1784-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Ram Bahadur . . . . Petitioner Vs. Shri Sudhir Rajpal and others . . . . Respondents ** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA** ****
Present: - Mr.Jaspal Singh Maanipur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel has placed on record copy of the order dated 01.07.2026 passed in LPA-1571-2026 in order to contend that LPA filed against order dated 21.08.2025 passed in CWP-2882-2009 (Annexure P1) has been disposed of in terms of LPA-1810-2025 titled as AAS Mohammad and others Vs. State of Haryana and others , which was decided on 23.04.2026. Copy of the order as passed in LPA-1810-2025 is also placed on record.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) 10.09.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
VIVEK PAHWA 2026.09.10 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
AAS Mohammad and others Vs. State of Haryana and othersReferred¶9
LPA-1810-2025
Ram Bahadur
Shri Sudhir Rajpal
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
