Sitender Malik v. Vinay Pratap Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC19 May 2026COCP/1538/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; Sudeepti Sharma, J. (oral); decided 19.05.2026; COCP-1538-2026 (O&M); Sitender Malik v. Vinay Pratap Singh; contempt of court; disobedience of order dated 28.11.2025 in CWP-35248-2025; representation dated 13.10.2025; compliance report/affidavit dated 15.05.2026; speaking order dated 15.05.2026 (Annexure R-1); Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Haryana; contempt purged; rule discharged; liberty to challenge speaking order; pending applications disposed; DAG Haryana.

What did the court decide?

A perusal of the compliance report (affidavit dated 15.05.2026 of Vinay Pratap Singh, Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Haryana, along with speaking order dated 15.05.2026, Annexure R-1, taken on record) shows that the order dated 28.11.2025 passed in CWP-35248-2025 has been complied with. ¶¶18

Sitender Malik Vs Vinay Pratap Singh — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

COCP-1538-2026 (O&M) -1-

¶2

240

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

COCP-1538-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.05.2026

Sitender Malik

......Petitioner

Vs.

Vinay Pratap Singh ......Respondent

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

¶10

Present : Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶11

Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent.

¶12

¶13

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)

¶14

The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-35248-2025, whereby without adverting to the merits of the case, respondent was directed to consider and decide the representation dated 13.10.2025 filed by the petitioner.

¶15

In compliance of the order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-35248-2025, compliance report by way of affidavit dated 15.05.2026 of Vinay Pratap Singh, Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Haryana, along with speaking order dated 15.05.2026 (Annexure R-1), has been filed on behalf of the respondent in the Registry. The same is taken on record.

¶16

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.21 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

COCP-1538-2026 (O&M) -2-

¶18

A perusal of the said compliance report shows that order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-35248-2025 has been complied with.

¶19

In view of the above, since order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-35248-2025, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged.

¶20

Needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to avail remedy as is available to him in accordance with law to challenge the said speaking order dated 15.05.2026.

¶21

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶22

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE

¶23

19.05.2026 Virender

¶24

Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.21 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sitender Malik v. Vinay Pratap Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sitender Malik v. Vinay Pratap Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kajal and Others Vs Deen Mohd and Others

Raj Kumar Jain Vs Bir Sain Jain and Another

Bharat Bhushan Goel Vs Sumita Misra and Others

Ram Kumar Vs Vijai Vardhan, State Information Commissioner

Sandeep Kumar and Others Vs Ajay Singhal , IPS and Another

Amrik Singh Vs Jagat Jot Goyal Chief Engineer Dept of Water Suppy and Sanitation