Contempt petition for alleged disobedience of an interim order; respondent had preferred an LPA in which the underlying order was stayed, so the contempt petition was dismissed with liberty to seek remedies after the LPA is decided.
Liberty to petitioners to avail legal remedies after decision of LPA-1184-2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
236
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1524-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2026
Reetu and others
......Petitioners
Vs.
Pankaj Goyal
......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present : None for the petitioners.
Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
13.05.2026 Virender
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.16 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
Reetu and others
Pankaj Goyal
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
